Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342752›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2025

Effects of partial soybean meal replacement with sunflower meal and non-starch polysaccharide degrading enzymes supplementation on broiler growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut morphology.

Zeeshan Munawar, Saad Amjid, Faisal Ramzan, Azhar Rafique, Safdar Hassan, Urooj Anwar, Momna Mehmood, Umar Farooq, Muhammad Farooq Khalid, Riaz Mustafa and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zeeshan MunawarInstitute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Saad AmjidInstitute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Faisal RamzanInstitute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Azhar RafiqueDepartment of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Safdar HassanInstitute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Urooj AnwarInstitute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Momna MehmoodDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture, Multan, 66000, Pakistan.
Umar FarooqSub Campus, Toba Tek Sing, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 36050, Pakistan.
Muhammad Farooq KhalidSub Campus, Toba Tek Sing, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 36050, Pakistan.
Riaz MustafaSub Campus, Toba Tek Sing, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 36050, Pakistan.
Muhammad RiazInstitute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Aziz Ur RahmanInstitute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Waseem AbbasInstitute of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Soybean meal (SBM) is the primary protein source in broiler diets; however, its high cost and import dependency necessitate alternative protein sources. Sunflower meal (SFM) is a viable alternative but contains high fiber and non-starch polysaccharides (NSPs), which can impair nutrient utilization. This study evaluated the effects of partially replacing SBM with SFM, with or without NSP degrading enzymes (NSPase) enzyme supplementation, on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, digesta viscosity, and gut morphology in broilers. Materials and Methods: A total of 588 day-old Ross-308 broiler chicks were randomly assigned to six dietary treatments following a 3 × 2 factorial design, with three levels of SBM replacement (0%, 10%, and 20% SFM) and two levels of NSPase supplementation (0 or 100 g/ton feed). Diets were formulated for the starter (1-10 days), grower (11-21 days), and finisher (22-35 days) phases. Growth performance (body weight gain [BWG], feed intake [FI], feed conversion ratio [FCR]), nutrient digestibility (dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, and crude fiber [CF]), digesta viscosity, and gut morphology (villus height [VH], crypt depth [CD], villus width, and villus-to-crypt ratio) were assessed. Statistical analysis was conducted using two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's test for mean comparisons (p < 0.05). Results: Replacing SBM with up to 20% SFM did not significantly impact BWG (p > 0.05), FI (p > 0.05), or FCR (p > 0.05). However, digesta viscosity increased significantly with higher SFM levels (p < 0.001), while NSPase supplementation reduced viscosity (p < 0.001). CF digestibility was lower with increasing SFM levels (p < 0.01) but improved with NSPase addition (p < 0.01). Gut morphology parameters, including VH and CD, were negatively affected by higher SFM inclusion but showed improvement with NSPase supplementation. Conclusion: SBM can be partially replaced with up to 20% SFM in broiler diets without compromising growth performance. However, increasing SFM levels can reduce CF digestibility and increase digesta viscosity. The addition of NSPase enzymes mitigates these adverse effects by enhancing fiber digestibility and reducing gut viscosity. These findings support the use of SFM as an economically viable protein alternative in broiler feed formulations, particularly in SBM-importing regions.

Indexed as

broiler nutritionfeed efficiencygut morphologynon-starch polysaccharide degrading enzymesnutrient digestibilitysoybean meal replacementsunflower meal

Identifiers

PMID40342752
PMCPMC12056904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.