Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342747›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2025

Cultural practices, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and wildlife interface: Zoonotic disease risks among the Phu Thai Ethnic Group in Thailand.

Nisachon Bubpa, Kanokwan Suwannarong, Kannika Thammasutti, Thanomsin Ponlap, Worakamon Thongkan, Paisit Boonyakawee, Phitsanuruk Kanthawee, Kangsadal Suwannarong, Withaya Chanchai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nisachon BubpaDepartment of Family and Community Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Kanokwan SuwannarongCenter of Excellence for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases in Animals, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kannika ThammasuttiCenter of Excellence for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases in Animals, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanomsin PonlapSUPA71 Co., Ltd, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worakamon ThongkanSUPA71 Co., Ltd, Bangkok, Thailand.
Paisit BoonyakaweeSirindhorn College of Public Health Trang, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Ministry of Public Health, Trang, Thailand.
Phitsanuruk KanthaweeUnit for Area-based Research and Innovation in Cross-Border Health Care, Department of Public Health, School of Health Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chaing Rai, Thailand.
Kangsadal SuwannarongThe Office of Disease Prevention and Control 7 Khon Kaen, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Withaya ChanchaiDepartment of Public Health, Major in Occupational Health and Safety Program, Faculty of Medicine, Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Emerging infectious diseases, with 75% originating from zoonotic sources, highlight the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic underscored the importance of the One Health (OH) approach, especially in rural and ethnic communities where cultural practices and wildlife interactions may amplify zoonotic disease risks. This study determined the healthcare-seeking behaviors and wildlife interface of the Phu Thai ethnic group in Mukdahan Province, Thailand, to understand their cultural practices, zoonotic disease risks, and pandemic-related adaptations. Materials and Methods: From June to July 2023, a qualitative study was conducted in three villages of Nong Sung District, Mukdahan Province. Data collection included 3 focus group discussions (16 respondents), 6 in-depth interviews, and 5 key informant interviews, with a total of 27 respondents consisting of community members, leaders, and government officials. Thematic analysis was performed to explore cultural traditions, wildlife interactions, healthcare practices, and perceptions of COVID-19. Results: The Phu Thai people maintain a deep connection to cultural traditions, including ancestral rituals and wildlife use for food and ceremonies. While traditional practices such as consuming raw wildlife persist, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced their attitudes, leading to increased caution and community-driven preventive measures. Limited knowledge about zoonotic diseases and unsafe practices, such as handling wildlife without protection, were identified as risk factors. Accessibility to healthcare services was moderate, with language barriers and resource constraints posing challenges. However, the community demonstrated resilience by adopting local initiatives such as mask-making and remote traditional healing. Conclusion: This study highlights the complex interplay between culture, healthcare access, and zoonotic risks in the Phu Thai community. Enhancing culturally sensitive health education, promoting safe wildlife interaction practices, and leveraging the OH framework can reduce zoonotic disease risks while respecting traditional practices. The findings suggest that key stakeholders, such as community members, leaders, traditional healers, public health officers, local authorities, and relevant stakeholders, should be informed to gather their feedback and support in improving policies and regulations related to wildlife contact and practices. These efforts are expected to contribute to sustainable health outcomes and align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3 (health and well-being) and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production).

Indexed as

coronavirus disease 2019emerging infectious diseaseshealthcare-seeking behaviorsMukdahanOne HealthPhu ThaiThailandwildlife interfacezoonotic diseases

Identifiers

PMID40342747
PMCPMC12056899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.