ArticleVeterinary world2025
Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Advances of Curcumin and Nanocurcumin in Glioblastoma: Molecular Targets, Bioavailability, and Drug Delivery.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Functional restoration of conformational (R175H) and contact (R273H) mutant p53 byFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Topical anti-inflammatory potential of ethanol extract ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: p53 is a critical tumor suppressor protein responsible for regulating the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis. Mutations in the Materials and Methods: Curcumin and 20 derivatives were selected from PubChem for computational analysis. Their potential as p53 enhancers was assessed using Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) analysis. Molecular docking was conducted to determine their binding affinities with wild-type and mutant p53 proteins, followed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to evaluate ligand-receptor stability. Pharmacokinetics and toxicity assessments were performed using predictive computational models to evaluate their drug-like properties. Results: QSAR analysis identified hexahydrocurcumin (probable activity [Pa]: 0.837) and tetrahydrocurcumin (Pa: 0.752) as the most potent p53 enhancers. Molecular docking revealed strong binding affinities for curcumin derivatives at key p53 binding residues, particularly through hydrogen bonds with His 273 of the R273H mutant. MD simulations demonstrated that curcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin, and monodemethylcurcumin stabilized p53 mutant R273H, closely mimicking the structural stability of wild-type p53. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated favorable absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion profiles for most derivatives, with low toxicity predicted for the majority. Conclusion: Curcumin and its derivatives exhibit dual functions as p53 enhancers and reactivators of the p53 mutant R273H. Hexahydrocurcumin and tetrahydrocurcumin emerged as promising compounds with strong bioactivity and favorable pharmacokinetic properties, suggesting their potential as anticancer agents. Further
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.