ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Quantification of Small-Scale Spatial Patterns in Alpine-Treeline Ecotones.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alpine treeline ecotones world wide: fine-scale spatial patterns and environmental controls.The New phytologist · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alpine treeline ecotones, when viewed up close, display considerable variation in spatial patterns, which have been associated with different responses to climate change. Two important dimensions of treeline-ecotone spatial patterns are the abruptness of the change in tree height ("abrupt" vs. "gradual") and the change in canopy cover ("discrete" vs. "diffuse") when moving from closed forest to treeless alpine vegetation. These dimensions are suited to classify treeline ecotones into different types of patterns, but this is typically done intuitively without explicitly stated criteria, and patterns are not quantified. Consistent, robust metrics allowing comparisons between sites are lacking. We suggest several metrics to quantify abruptness and discreteness of treeline ecotones and describe how to derive these metrics from point-pattern data of tree positions and sizes, and from high-resolution treecover data. We developed these based on field data from the Spanish Pyrenees and an extensive dataset of treeline patterns created by the individual-based Spatial Treeline-Ecotone Model (STEM). We quantified the abruptness of a treeline by the largest change in canopy height, determined in 5-m bands, between the top of the ecotone (i.e., alpine vegetation) and the first band where canopy height exceeds 3 m. We quantified the discreteness by the steepness of a logistic function fitted to tree cover. Band widths and cut-off values were optimised for our data. Although they can be flexibly adjusted to specific case studies, standard settings are recommended to assure comparability. Our results indicate that the "discreteness" metric provides a satisfactory quantification of this pattern dimension within the dataset used here, whereas the "abruptness" pattern dimension turned out to be more difficult to capture. The metrics developed here may provide field researchers with a tool to compare their field sites in a standardised way, and potentially promote synthesis on treeline data and dynamics on a global scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.