Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342717›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Quantification of Small-Scale Spatial Patterns in Alpine-Treeline Ecotones.

Lukas Flinspach, Thorsten Wiegand, J Julio Camarero, Enric Batllori, Emilia Gutiérrez, Maaike Y Bader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas FlinspachHelmholtz Center for Environmental Research Leipzig Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4702-8240
Thorsten WiegandHelmholtz Center for Environmental Research Leipzig Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3721-2248
J Julio CamareroInstituto Pirenaico de Ecología (IPE-CSIC) Zaragoza Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-2922
Enric BatlloriDepartament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Biologia Universitat de Barcelona (UB) Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2130-0489
Emilia GutiérrezFaculty of Biology, Ecology University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6085-5700
Maaike Y BaderFaculty of Geography, Ecological Plant Geography University of Marburg Marburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4300-7598

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpine treeline ecotones, when viewed up close, display considerable variation in spatial patterns, which have been associated with different responses to climate change. Two important dimensions of treeline-ecotone spatial patterns are the abruptness of the change in tree height ("abrupt" vs. "gradual") and the change in canopy cover ("discrete" vs. "diffuse") when moving from closed forest to treeless alpine vegetation. These dimensions are suited to classify treeline ecotones into different types of patterns, but this is typically done intuitively without explicitly stated criteria, and patterns are not quantified. Consistent, robust metrics allowing comparisons between sites are lacking. We suggest several metrics to quantify abruptness and discreteness of treeline ecotones and describe how to derive these metrics from point-pattern data of tree positions and sizes, and from high-resolution treecover data. We developed these based on field data from the Spanish Pyrenees and an extensive dataset of treeline patterns created by the individual-based Spatial Treeline-Ecotone Model (STEM). We quantified the abruptness of a treeline by the largest change in canopy height, determined in 5-m bands, between the top of the ecotone (i.e., alpine vegetation) and the first band where canopy height exceeds 3 m. We quantified the discreteness by the steepness of a logistic function fitted to tree cover. Band widths and cut-off values were optimised for our data. Although they can be flexibly adjusted to specific case studies, standard settings are recommended to assure comparability. Our results indicate that the "discreteness" metric provides a satisfactory quantification of this pattern dimension within the dataset used here, whereas the "abruptness" pattern dimension turned out to be more difficult to capture. The metrics developed here may provide field researchers with a tool to compare their field sites in a standardised way, and potentially promote synthesis on treeline data and dynamics on a global scale.

Indexed as

agent‐based modellingalpine treelinepattern‐process relationshipssummary statistics

Identifiers

PMID40342717
PMCPMC12058455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.