ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Robot-Aided Measurement of Insect Diversity on Vegetation Using Environmental DNA.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes Through Drone-Based Environmental DNA Sampling.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Real-time malaria detection in the Amazon rainforest via drone-collected eDNA and portable qPCR.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Insect Decline in the Anthropocene: Historical Parallels and Emerging Monitoring Tools.Insects · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional methods of biodiversity monitoring are often logistically challenging, time-consuming, require experienced experts on species identification, and sometimes include destruction of the targeted specimens. Here, we investigated a non-invasive approach of combining the use of drones and environmental DNA (eDNA) to monitor insect biodiversity on vegetation. We aimed to assess the efficiency of this novel method in capturing insect diversity and comparing insect composition across different vegetation types (grassland, shrub and forest) in Switzerland. A commercial, off-the-shelf drone was equipped with a specialised probe that autonomously swabbed vegetation and collected eDNA. Then, samples were processed using rapid third-generation Oxford Nanopore sequencing. The obtained data were analysed for insect diversity, comparing taxonomic richness, evenness and community composition across the three habitat types using statistical techniques. Sequencing of the samples yielded 76 hexapod taxa, revealing an insect community with notable differences in taxonomic richness but not in evenness across grassland, shrub and forest habitats. Our study demonstrates the potential of drone-based sampling integrated with eDNA and nanopore sequencing for biodiversity monitoring, offering a non-destructive method for detecting insect occurrence on plant surfaces. Integrating robotics and eDNA technology provides a promising solution for fast, large-scale, non-invasive biodiversity monitoring, potentially improving conservation efforts and ecosystem management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.