Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342623›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2025

Potential and pitfalls of measuring circulating anti-nephrin autoantibodies in glomerular diseases.

Felicitas E Hengel, Tobias B Huber, Nicola M Tomas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Nephrotic Syndrome: Current Management.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Podocytopathies.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  13. Serum Factors in Primary Podocytopathies.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felicitas E HengelIII. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias B HuberIII. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nicola M TomasIII. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have identified autoantibodies targeting the podocyte protein nephrin in patients with primary podocytopathies such as minimal change disease, primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), post-transplant recurrent FSGS and childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. These antibodies bind nephrin and directly influence nephrin downstream signaling, with immense effect on the podocytes' cellular structure and function, substantially changing our understanding of antibody-mediated podocytopathies and disease classification. Their presence correlates with disease activity and holds great potential as a novel biomarker of anti-nephrin-associated podocytopathy. However, the detection of these potentially low-titre autoantibodies has proven challenging. In this review, we highlight and explain distinct detection methodologies with their advantages and disadvantages and discuss the potential of anti-nephrin autoantibodies as a novel biomarker in nephrotic syndrome for diagnosis, prognostication and therapeutic guidance in patients with nephrotic syndrome.

Indexed as

autoantibodiesglomerulonephritisminimal change diseasenephrinnephrotic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40342623
PMCPMC12059633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.