ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Perspectives on When to Schedule the EM Clerkship and Its Effect on Students in an Environment of Changing Curricula.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates medical students' opinions on the optimal timing for taking the emergency medicine (EM) clerkship and its effects on preparedness for subsequent clerkships and the USMLE (United States Medical Licensing Examination) Step 2 examination. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among third- and fourth-year students at the Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine. The survey collected opinions on the optimal timing for the EM clerkship and its impact on self-efficacy as well as perceived preparedness for future clerkships and the USMLE Step 2 examination. Results: Only 5% of third-year EM clerkship students felt they would have been more prepared in their fourth year. Conversely, 70% of fourth-year students believed they were more prepared than if they had taken it in their third year. Students were evenly split on if an earlier EM clerkship would have been helpful for subsequent clerkships. 88% of pre-USMLE Step 2 students found it helpful for Step 2, while 37% of post-USMLE Step 2 students felt it would have helped their preparedness. Additionally, 96% of students stated the EM clerkship increased their confidence in seeing patients. 43% of those who took the clerkship in their fourth year reported they would have considered EM as a specialty had they taken it earlier. Most students recommended taking the EM clerkship during the second 6 months of clerkships. Conclusion: There are mixed opinions among medical students regarding the helpfulness of taking the EM clerkship earlier for subsequent clerkships and USMLE Step 2 preparedness. However, the majority recommend taking the EM clerkship earlier. A significant proportion of participants would have considered EM as a specialty if they had taken the clerkship earlier. Furthermore, 96% reported increased self-efficacy. Therefore, encouraging students to take the EM clerkship earlier may increase self-confidence and allow for earlier career exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.