ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The poverty prevention effects of health insurance: evidence from China's basic medical insurance program.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing the decision to opt out of basic medical insurance among China's migrant population: a logistic regression analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Determinants of health poverty vulnerability of rural households in Jiangxi Province, China: an analysis based on risk theory.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Can supplementary private health insurance reduce poverty vulnerability? Evidence from Shandong Province.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: China's Basic Medical Insurance (BMI) system is designed to alleviate illness-induced poverty. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of BMI in pre-venting households from falling into poverty, uncover its underlying mechanisms, and propose a preferential subsidy policy to address existing inequities. Methods: Panel data from the 2010-2018 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) were used. We employed Probit and Heckman models to assess how BMI enrollment influences poverty likelihood, focusing on rural-urban differences, total healthcare expenditures, and out-of-pocket (OOP) spending. We also proposed a tiered, progressively subsidized policy-"income segmentation with progressive reimbursement"-as a potential strategy to bolster poverty prevention among low-income households. Results: Our findings indicate that BMI enrollment significantly reduces the probability of house-holds becoming poor, with more pronounced effects in rural areas than in urban ones. Following enrollment, total healthcare expenditures rise substantially and health outcomes improve, yet OOP expenses do not show a corresponding decline and can even increase for urban residents. Moreover, higher-income groups benefit more from BMI, whereas low-income families face financial constraints that limit their ability to fully utilize these benefits. Conclusions: Despite BMI's success in improving health out-comes, moral hazard remains a concern, particularly in urban settings. A tiered, progressively subsidized approach can more effectively support low-income households, lowering their risk of falling back into poverty due to illness. These results underscore the importance of refining insurance policies to ensure that vulnerable populations can fully benefit from healthcare coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.