Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342449›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Improving Pediatric Surgical Follow-Up Documentation: A Prospective Clinical Audit in the Department of Pediatric Surgery at National Ribat University Hospital, Sudan.

Mohamed Y Ibrahim, Alshaima Koko, Arwa Abdelraouf Ahmed, Esra S Abdalgadir, Mohammed Alameen Genaid Malik Moheyaldeen, Salah Aldeen Alsheikh, Mohamed Khalafalla, Marwa Suliman, Mohamed Fadlalla, Mohamed Alghazali and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mohamed Y IbrahimPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Alshaima KokoPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Arwa Abdelraouf AhmedPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Esra S AbdalgadirPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Mohammed Alameen Genaid Malik MoheyaldeenPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Salah Aldeen AlsheikhTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ibrahim Malik Teaching Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Mohamed KhalafallaPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Marwa SulimanPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Mohamed FadlallaPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Mohamed AlghazaliTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ibrahim Malik Teaching Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Hussamaldin HassanPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Noura AliPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Almuaz AliPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Nafisa AhmedPaediatric Surgery Center, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.
Ahmed H ElhusseinInternal Medicine, National Ribat University Hospital, Khartoum, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProper clinical documentation is essential for patient safety and the continuity of care, especially in pediatric surgery. In a resource-limited setting at Ribat University Teaching Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan (2021-2022), this study looked at how well the B-SOAP (short for Background, Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) follow-up documentation structure was followed. Baseline audits identified significant flaws, with a 21.9% (21 out of 96) adherence rate, highlighting systemic shortcomings in organized documentation standards. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a prospective observational audit over three cycles (pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention), examining 68 B-SOAP sheets. Cause-and-effect diagrams and Pareto charts used in pre-intervention audits showed that the main problems were a lack of standard templates, poor training, and monitoring that wasn't consistent. Interventions comprised the revision of the B-SOAP template, the implementation of training sessions, and the establishment of audit feedback mechanisms. Compliance was evaluated by descriptive statistics, utilizing a 90% standard for completeness and correctness.

resultsPost-intervention compliance increased markedly to 90% (22 out of 24) (Δ+68.1%), exceeding objectives. The most significant improvement was seen in the Plan part, which went from 32.5% (seven out of 21) to 65% (14 out of 22). This was followed by the Subjective (21.2%, from four out of 21 to nine out of 22) and Assessment (21.0%, from two out of 21 to seven out of 22) parts. The documenting of objectives continued to be difficult (+16.4%), indicating ongoing obstacles to uniform data entry. Iterative audits and systematic feedback facilitated gradual improvements, consistent with evidence about the effectiveness of audits in resource-constrained environments.

conclusionStructured interventions, such as standardizing templates, training, and regular audits, greatly increased B-SOAP compliance, showing that it is possible to do so with paper-based systems. Despite problems with the infrastructure, the fact that 90% of the people who were supposed to follow the rules did so after the intervention shows how important it is to improve quality in a planned way. Maintaining progress necessitates continuous education, regular audits, and scalable digital solutions. This study gives a framework that can be used again and again to improve clinical documentation in similar settings with limited resources. This will immediately improve patient safety and care quality.

Indexed as

clinical audit systemimproving healthcare qualitypediatricspediatric surgeryquality improvement projectssurgery

Identifiers

PMID40342449
PMCPMC12060831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.