ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
European survey on CAR T-Cell analytical methods from apheresis to post-infusion immunomonitoring.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of point-of-care manufactured CAR T cell therapy for B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Vietnam.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
- Securing raw materials, reagents, and consumable supplies in the academic bioproduction UNITC network: because the chain is only as strong as its weakest link.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a revolutionary approach to cancer treatment. Given the rapid expansion of new indications addressed by newly developed CAR T-cell products, it is essential to standardize analytical methods for the characterization/monitoring of apheresis materials, drug products, and post-infusion patient samples. Methods: The T2Evolve Consortium, part of the European Union's Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), conducted an extensive anonymous online survey between February and June 2022. Comprising 36 questions, the survey targeted a wide range of stakeholders involved in engineered T-cell therapies, including researchers, manufacturers, and clinicians. Its goal was to address the current variability within the CAR T-cell field, focusing on analytical assays for quality control of apheresis materials, drug products, and post-infusion immunomonitoring. Another objective was to identify gaps and needs in the field. Results: A total of 53 respondents from 13 european countries completed the survey, providing insights into the most commonly used assays for apheresis material and drug product characterization, alongside safety and efficacy tests required by the Pharmacopeia. Notably, a minority of respondents conducted phenotypical characterization of T-cell subsets in the drug product and assessed activation/exhaustion T cell profiles. Conclusion: The survey underscored the necessity to standardize CAR T-cell functional potency assays and identify predictive biomarkers for response, relapse, and toxicity. Additionally, responses indicated significant variability in CAR T-cell monitoring during short-term patient follow-up across clinical centers. This European survey represents the first initiative to report current approaches in different stages of CAR T-cell therapies via a survey, from drug product quality controls to post-infusion immunomonitoring. Based on these findings, and with input from T2EVOLVE experts, the next step will be to address harmonization in the identified areas. These efforts are anticipated to significantly enhance cancer patients' access to engineered T cell therapy safely and effectively throughout Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.