Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342398›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2025

Co-design of an outcome measure for hand burn injuries.

Andrea Mc Kittrick, Louise Gustafsson, Tenelle Hodson, Amelia Di Tommaso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea Mc KittrickDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6647-272X
Louise GustafssonDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5232-0987
Tenelle HodsonDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, QLD, Australia.
Amelia Di TommasoDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Measurement of postburn injury is important to assess impact of interventions, monitor symptoms, and direct treatment. Outcome measures are important to enable patients' views to be incorporated into their clinical care and direct healthcare. To date, there are few patient-reported outcome measures specific for the burn's population, only one specific patient reported questionnaire exists for hand burn injuries. For outcome measures to be person focused, it is important to have individuals who have experienced the injury join the development team to consult and advise on properties for inclusion. The aim of this study was to co-design a specific outcome measure for severe hand burn injuries. Methods: Participatory Action Research was used to co-design the outcome measure with experienced allied health professionals, individuals with hand burn injuries, and researchers. Participatory Action Research acknowledges the depth and breadth of experience of all co-researchers. Content analysis was used to systematically analyze meaning and relationships from each cycle. Results: In cycle 1-the constructs for measurement and activities for inclusion in the outcome measure were selected over a series of virtual meetings. The 18 activities included measure patterns of hand movement, pinch, and grip strength, which can be repeatedly measured over time across recovery. In cycle 2-two rating scales were developed one for clinicians and one for patients. Conclusion: The newly developed outcome measure will require further testing to determine psychometric properties.

Indexed as

co-designHand burnsoutcome measureparticipationpatient rating scale

Identifiers

PMID40342398
PMCPMC11887573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.