Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342394›Full record

ArticleMicrochemical journal : devoted to the application of microtechniques in all branches of science2025

Bioanalytical considerations for quantification of ondansetron in rat microdialysis study using LC-MS/MS.

Yae Eun Chong, Anna Siemiątkowska, Christine Yohn, Simon Haroutounian, Leonid Kagan, Katarzyna Kosicka-Noworzyń

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microchemical journal : devoted to the application of microtechniques in all branches of science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yae Eun ChongDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Translational Research and Education, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 160 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Anna SiemiątkowskaDepartment of Physical Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 3 Rokietnicka Street, 60-806 Poznań, Poland.
Christine YohnDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Translational Research and Education, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 160 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Simon HaroutounianDepartment of Anesthesiology and Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Leonid KaganDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Translational Research and Education, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 160 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Katarzyna Kosicka-NoworzyńDepartment of Physical Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 3 Rokietnicka Street, 60-806 Poznań, Poland.

Funding

5-HT3 receptor antagonists for neuropathic painR01NS104500 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAROUTOUNIAN, SIMON · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ondansetron is an anti-emetic drug and has been recently identified as a therapeutic for neuropathic pain. Permeability of ondansetron into the nervous system may be impacted by the presence of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) at the blood brain barrier, since ondansetron is a substrate of Pgp, which means it may not easily cross into the brain. In order to determine a drug concentration within the brain, microdialysis can be used, which measures unbound analyte concentrations in tissues or body fluids. Aim: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an LC-MS/MS method to measure ondansetron concentrations in serum and brain microdialysates for pharmacokinetic studies in rats. To the best of our knowledge, a fully validated method for the quantification of ondansetron in brain microdialysis studies has not been reported so far. Methods: Chromatographic separation was achieved at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min using the Gemini C18 column (5 μm; 50 × 4.6 mm) and a mobile phase consisting of 10 mM ammonium formate with 0.1 % formic acid in water and 0.1 % formic acid in acetonitrile (55:45, v/v). Serum samples were prepared by protein precipitation; for microdialysate, no specific cleaning procedure was needed, they were only diluted with the internal standard solution. Results: The presented method requires only a small volume of serum (2.5 μL) and microdialysate (15-20 μL), which allows for frequent sampling in animals. Moreover, it enables high throughput due to a short run time and straightforward sample preparation. Artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) was confirmed to be useful as a surrogate matrix for brain microdialysate. The lower limit of quantitation for ondansetron was 0.01 μg/mL for serum and 0.025 ng/mL for microdialysate. A significant ion suppression for ondansetron was observed in brain microdialysate and aCSF, but the IS-normalized matrix factor was close to 1.0. Conclusion: The developed LC-MS/MS method met the FDA and EMA validation criteria and was successfully applied to the in vivo pilot pharmacokinetic study. It was sensitive enough to capture the low ondansetron concentrations in brain microdialysate and universal enough to measure high ondansetron concentrations in rat serum.

Indexed as

Drug distributionMethod validationPharmacokineticsTissue concentration

Identifiers

PMID40342394
PMCPMC12061041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.