Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342387›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2025

Percutaneous Cecostomy Catheters.

Oluwanifemi G Akinduro, Adam P Jacobs, Andrew J Gunn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oluwanifemi G AkinduroHeersink School of Medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Adam P JacobsDepartment of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Andrew J GunnDepartment of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous cecostomy catheters can be placed in the setting of either fecal incontinence or large bowel obstruction. While there are several etiologies for these disorders, the purpose of the cecostomy catheter is to provide ease of access for antegrade enemas in patients with fecal incontinence or relieve pain and discomfort in patients with a large bowel obstruction. Image-guided, percutaneous catheter placement into the cecum fits easily into the skillset of the interventional radiologist. Even though the literature consists of mostly single-center, retrospective case series, the procedure shows high rates of technical success, outstanding clinical outcomes, excellent patient satisfaction scores, and low rates of major adverse events. The purpose of this article is to review indications for cecostomy catheter placement, outline preprocedural patient evaluation, describe intraprocedural steps of catheter placement, detail postprocedural follow-up, and review both technical and clinical outcomes of cecostomy catheter placement.

Indexed as

antegrade enemascatheterscecostomy

Identifiers

PMID40342387
PMCPMC12058292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.