ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2025
Percutaneous Jejunostomy.
Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct percutaneous jejunostomy placement is an often underutilized procedure that can allow for supplemental enteral nutrition in a certain subset of patients, in which percutaneous gastrostomy is not technically feasible, or in patients who require post-pyloric feeding. Percutaneous jejunostomy catheter placement was first described in the 1980s; since that time there have been minimal case series on the procedural technique and outcomes. At our institution, we perform percutaneous jejunostomy placement as a planned two-stage procedure. During the initial stage, direct jejunostomy is performed under a combination of fluoroscopic and ultrasound guidance, after distending the jejunum through a nasojejunal tube. After confirming intraluminal access, at least one Cope suture anchor is deployed, and guidewire access is maintained. Subsequently, the track is serially dilated, and a 14-Fr pigtail catheter is placed into the jejunum. Approximately 4 to 6 weeks later, the patient returns for conversion of the pigtail drain into a formal jejunostomy catheter with retention balloon, under fluoroscopic guidance. Several of the prior larger studies on the technique have noted major complications to occur in 12% of patients and minor complications to occur in 9.8% of patients. While percutaneous jejunostomy placement is not a frequently performed procedure, technical success and complication rates are comparable to that of surgical jejunostomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.