Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342381›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2025

Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy Tube Placement Techniques.

Robert Kleven, Ian Ikeda, Joshua Cornman-Homonoff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert KlevenDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ian IkedaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Joshua Cornman-HomonoffDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-9009-8384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrostomy tubes are a common procedure for interventional radiologists. Several techniques are available to obtain gastric access radiologically, including the antegrade, retrograde, and balloon-assisted techniques. The choice of technique can depend on the patient's clinical presentation and the available services at each institution. Indications, preprocedural workup, technique, and postprocedural care help guide the choice of approach. Three common methods will be reviewed in this article: antegrade, retrograde, and balloon assisted. The antegrade technique is comparable to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement with a decreased incidence of tube dislodgement compared to the retrograde technique, but it requires reliable oral and esophageal access. The retrograde technique reduces the risk of postprocedural infection, has shorter procedure times, and reduces radiation exposure. The balloon-assisted technique reduces procedure time even more than the antegrade or retrograde technique, with comparable outcomes. Understanding the most common techniques available and how they compare is essential to providing patient-centered care.

Indexed as

enteral feedingfluoroscopic guidancegastrostomyinterventional radiologytechnique

Identifiers

PMID40342381
PMCPMC12058293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.