Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342377›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2025

Percutaneous Interventions and Necrosectomy in the Management of Peripancreatic Collections.

Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, Seyed Sina Zakavi, Kamyar Ghabili, Melike N Harfouche, Reena Jha, Juan C Camacho, Jamil Shaikh, Pejman Radkani, Walid M Chalhoub, Merve Ozen and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-AttariDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Seyed Sina ZakaviLiver and Gastrointestinal Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Kamyar GhabiliDepartment of Radiology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Melike N HarfoucheDepartment of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Reena JhaDepartment of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Juan C CamachoVascular and Interventional Radiology, Radiology Associates of Florida, Sarasota, Florida.
Jamil ShaikhDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Pejman RadkaniDepartment of Surgery, The Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.
Walid M ChalhoubDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.
Merve OzenDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Peiman HabibollahiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
John B SmirniotopoulosDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Nariman NezamiGeorgetown University Medical School, Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a severe inflammatory condition of the pancreas with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in its necrotizing form. This review explores the management of peripancreatic collections and in particular necrotizing pancreatitis, focusing on the evolution from traditional open surgical methods to contemporary minimally invasive image-guided techniques. AP can lead to various local complications, including pancreatic pseudocysts, acute necrotic collections, and walled-off necrosis. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosing complications of AP, while treatment approaches have shifted toward a step-up strategy involving percutaneous, endoscopic, and minimally invasive methods. Percutaneous necrosectomy, combining mechanical and chemical debridement, has shown promising results. Mechanical necrosectomy uses devices like baskets and retrieval nets, while chemical necrosectomy adds agents like hydrogen peroxide and streptokinase. Current evidence suggests that the step-up approach, starting with percutaneous drainage or necrosectomy and escalating to endoscopic or surgical interventions, if necessary, improves patient outcomes. The review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach in managing complicated AP and highlights ongoing advancements in minimally invasive techniques.

Indexed as

acute necrotizing pancreatitisdebridementinterventional radiologypancreatitiswalled-off necrosis

Identifiers

PMID40342377
PMCPMC12058290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.