ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Quality of Movement for Athletes 6 Months After ACL Reconstruction.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention programs address quality of movement to identify and correct high-risk movement patterns. However, return-to-play decisions after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are often based on non-sport related quantitative measures such as isokinetic tests, jump testing, and/or time from surgery, with 6 to 9 months a common expectation for progressing to sport-specific training and return to play. Purpose: To identify the presence in each limb of movement patterns associated with ACL injury in athletes 6 months post-ACLR using a quality-of-movement assessment. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence: 3. Methods: A quality-of-movement assessment including 10 dynamic tasks progressing from double- to single-limb and vertical to horizontal movements was administered to 148 athletes at 6 months after ACLR. Tasks were viewed live from the frontal and sagittal planes by a physical therapist and certified strength and conditioning specialist. Movements were evaluated for strategy, depth, alignment, symmetry, and control. The proportion of patients exhibiting faulty movement patterns for each task was assessed in the involved and uninvolved leg and between sex, meniscal injury status, and age. To examine the differences in age, patients were divided into age groups based on their age at the time of surgery (<14 years, 14-18, 19-25, 26-34, and ≥35 years). Results: Mean time of testing was 6.4 months after ACLR. All patients exhibited faulty movement patterns for ≥1 task on the involved leg. On the involved leg, the proportion of patients demonstrating faulty movement patterns for a task ranged from 52% to 95%. Forward stepdown ( Conclusion: Athletes demonstrated multiple faulty movement patterns that have been associated with both initial and second noncontact ACL injury. Faulty movement patterns were evident in tasks as simple as single-leg stance. The rates of faulty movement were similar in both male and female patients, as well as in the involved and uninvolved limb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.