Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342339›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Feasibility of online group stress management training compared to web-based individual training for employees-a randomized pilot study.

Leif Boß, Sandy Hannibal, Dirk Lehr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leif BoßDepartment of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, Institute of Sustainability Psychology (ISP), Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Sandy HannibalDepartment of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, Institute of Sustainability Psychology (ISP), Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Dirk LehrDepartment of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, Institute of Sustainability Psychology (ISP), Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent decades, digital stress management training, typically targeted at individuals, has gained increasing attention in health promotion. While these interventions show on average moderate to high effects on stress and other mental health outcomes, their use and acceptance in practice are often low. In contrast, group training may have advantages over these shortcomings. However, despite its widespread use in traditional non-digital health promotion, there is little evidence for digital training delivered in groups. Objective: This study's aim was to explore the feasibility of live, online stress management training delivered in a group format and compare it to Internet-based training targeting individuals. Methods: Employees ( Results: Participants in group training [Cohen's d = 0.9 (95% confidence interval: 0.4 to 1.5)] and individual training [1.3 (0.6 to 2.0)] both experienced statistically-significant reductions in stress, with no significant difference between the two training formats [0.25 (-0.32 to 0.83); Conclusion: This pilot study showed promising effects for the acceptance and health-related effectiveness of stress management training delivered in a group setting via videoconference. The findings highlight the value of personal contact with a coach and peers for positive user experiences during digital stress management interventions. Clinical trial registration: https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00024965, DRKS00024965.

Indexed as

acceptancehealth promotioninternet-based interventionsoccupational stresspatient preferencepreventionvideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID40342339
PMCPMC12058778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.