ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Comparison of the effectiveness of different scoring systems and biochemical markers in determining the severity and complications of acute pancreatitis.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for primary risk stratification in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Development of a three-species gut microbiome diagnostic model for acute pancreatitis and its association with systemic inflammation: a prospective cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Inflammation mediates the association between the Prognosis Nutrition Index (PNI) and mortality in acute pancreatitis: evidence from international cohorts.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aim: The aim of the study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of different scoring systems and inflammatory markers in predicting the severity, local complications, pancreatic necrosis, and mortality of acute pancreatitis (AP). Materials and methods: The data of 357 patients whom the severity of pancreatitis was classified according to the Revised Atlanta Classification System diagnosed with AP were retrospectively examined. Also The APACHE II, BISAP, mCTSI, and Ranson scores of all patients were calculated. After determining the cut-off values for scoring systems and inflammatory markers with ROC analysis, comparison for AP severity, local complication, necrosis, and mortality. Results: In the study, 2.8% of patients had severe pancreatitis. It was found that the risk of developing local complications increased 2.82 times in cases with an 48 Conclusion: Although the superiority of scoring systems could not be demonstrated in our study, CRP and MCTSI for local complications, BISAP for severity and Ranson score for mortality were the determining variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.