Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342317›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025

Differentiation of multinodular and vacuolating neuronal tumor and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor based on MRI.

Burcu Gül, Bora Korkmazer, Ahmet Kürşat Karaman, Esra Koçhan Kizilkiliç, Mahmut Esat Aykan, Çiğdem Özkara, Nil Çomunoğlu, Cihan Işler, Serdar Arslan, Osman Kizilkiliç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Burcu GülDepartment of Radiology, Intermed Clinic, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-0605
Bora KorkmazerDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7015-365X
Ahmet Kürşat KaramanDepartment of Radiology, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training Hospital, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4870-0597
Esra Koçhan KizilkiliçDepartment of Neurology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2623-2710
Mahmut Esat AykanDepartment of Radiology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-5136
Çiğdem ÖzkaraDepartment of Neurology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-1838
Nil ÇomunoğluDepartment of Pathology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2319-1757
Cihan IşlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-3338
Serdar ArslanDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-4326
Osman KizilkiliçDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-8934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: To compare the MRI findings and clinical features of multinodular and vacuolating neuronal tumor (MVNT) and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNET), and reveal the distinguishing features of these tumors from each other. Materials and methods: Patients with a suspected magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based diagnosis of MVNT between 2018 and 2022 were collected from the hospital database. In addition, patients diagnosed with DNET on histopathological examination and who had MRIs in the same time period were included in the study. The MRI findings and clinical features were evaluated for each patient. Results: There were 21 patients in the MVNT group and 20 patients in the DNET group. Headache was the most common symptom in patients with MVNTs (61.9%), whereas seizures were more prevalent in those with DNETs (70%). The most frequent locations for the MVNTs were the frontal and parietal lobes (66.6%), while DNETs were most commonly located in the temporal lobe (60%). All the MVNTs were hyperintense in both fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). All the DNETs were hyperintense on T2WI. However, on FLAIR, seven (35%) of the DNET lesions were hyperintense, while the remaining 13 lesions showed mixed signal intensity forming a bubbly appearance. Moreover, 20 of 21 (95.23%) MVNTs were hyperintense on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b800), with no apparent diffusion coefficient hypointensity in the lesions. None of the DNETs showed hyperintensity on DWI. Conclusion: MRI findings, particularly those observed on FLAIR and DWI, may be helpful for distinguishing between MVNTs and DNETs, especially in cases where the differential diagnosis is challenging.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasms, NeuroepithelialAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultdysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumorglioneuronal tumormagnetic resonance imagingMultinodular and vacuolating neuronal tumorseizure

Identifiers

PMID40342317
PMCPMC12058023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.