ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Does dexmedetomidine infusion reduce the postoperative analgesic need in lumbar disc surgery?
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07389096 (Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia For Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia For Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Patients experience moderate-to-severe pain, especially in the first days after lumbar disc surgery. Poorly controlled pain in the postoperative period negatively affects patient outcomes. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2 adrenoceptor agonist with demonstrated analgesic efficacy. However, conflicting results have been reported in the current literature regarding the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in this surgery. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that dexmedetomidine safely improves pain scores and reduces opioid consumption in lumbar microdiscectomy. Materials and methods: Medical records of patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy with general anesthesia between January 2023 and October 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups as those who did not receive dexmedetomidine infusion (Group A) and those who received dexmedetomidine infusion (Group B). Patients in Group B received a loading dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h. The primary outcome of our study was postoperative fentanyl consumption at the 24 Results: A total of 68 patients were included in our study, 34 patients in each group. The number of patients requiring fentanyl in the recovery unit and the dose of fentanyl administered were similar in both groups (p = 0.223 and p = 0.373, respectively). There was no statistical difference in the pain scores, opioid consumption, and perioperative complications at the 2 Conclusion: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion did not reduce postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy under general anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.