Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342316›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025

Does dexmedetomidine infusion reduce the postoperative analgesic need in lumbar disc surgery?

Sibel Çatalca, Özlem Özmete, Numan Berk, Soner Çivi, Emre Durdağ, Caner Incekaş, Nesrin Bozdoğan Özyilkan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07389096 (Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia For Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07389096 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia For Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNashwa AhmedRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsOpioid Free AnesthesiaArmsDexmedetomidine, Fentanyl (IV)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sibel ÇatalcaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Adana, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8899-1106
Özlem ÖzmeteDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Adana, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5845-699X
Numan BerkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Adana, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-6742
Soner ÇiviDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Adana, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1055-5152
Emre DurdağDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Adana, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6939-5491
Caner IncekaşDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-423X
Nesrin Bozdoğan ÖzyilkanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University, Adana, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4973-8132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Patients experience moderate-to-severe pain, especially in the first days after lumbar disc surgery. Poorly controlled pain in the postoperative period negatively affects patient outcomes. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2 adrenoceptor agonist with demonstrated analgesic efficacy. However, conflicting results have been reported in the current literature regarding the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in this surgery. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that dexmedetomidine safely improves pain scores and reduces opioid consumption in lumbar microdiscectomy. Materials and methods: Medical records of patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy with general anesthesia between January 2023 and October 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups as those who did not receive dexmedetomidine infusion (Group A) and those who received dexmedetomidine infusion (Group B). Patients in Group B received a loading dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h. The primary outcome of our study was postoperative fentanyl consumption at the 24 Results: A total of 68 patients were included in our study, 34 patients in each group. The number of patients requiring fentanyl in the recovery unit and the dose of fentanyl administered were similar in both groups (p = 0.223 and p = 0.373, respectively). There was no statistical difference in the pain scores, opioid consumption, and perioperative complications at the 2 Conclusion: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion did not reduce postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy under general anesthesia.

Indexed as

Analgesics, Non-NarcoticDexmedetomidineDiskectomyLumbar VertebraePostoperative PainAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleFentanylHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AgonistsAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidDexmedetomidineFentanylDexmedetomidinegeneral anesthesialumbar microdiscectomypostoperative analgesia

Identifiers

PMID40342316
PMCPMC12058006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.