ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2025
Bibliotherapy for stress management: a wellness intervention for first-year medical students.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This proof-of-concept study aimed to evaluate if a library-initiated program of bibliotherapy could be effective in reducing overall levels of stress and anxiety in first-year medical students. Methods: This mixed-methods study consisted of an Interrupted Time Series (ITS) where participants established baseline levels of stress and anxiety by completing the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) three times prior to intervention and three times following, with a bibliotherapy intervention delivered at the halfway point. Four focus groups were held following completion of the ITS with questions designed to solicit feedback related to how enjoyable and valuable participants found the study, as well as priorities for wellness. Results: An independent samples t-test was conducted to compare mean PSS-10 scores in the pre-intervention group to those in the post-intervention group. The results indicate no significant difference between scores pre-intervention (M= 17.85, SD=6.76) and post-intervention (M=17.21, SD=6.87, t(162)=.604, two-sided p=.547, 95% CI [-1.46, 2.75]). Focus group analysis revealed that participants found involvement in the study to be a useful component of a personal wellness or mental health maintenance program. Conclusions: Quantitative results did not achieve statistical significance, but analysis of focus groups indicates that participants derived benefit from involvement in the study, particularly related to the regular self-reflection required by completing the monthly PSS-10. The study is a successful proof-of-concept, indicating that medical students derive benefit from a librarian-led bibliotherapy program as part of student wellness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.