ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025
Atrial fibrillation patients presenting to an emergency department successfully managed with a next-day community follow-up pathway: A before-and-after cohort study.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of the new clinical pathway for patients presenting to an ED with AF, incorporating community next-working-day follow-up and more specific clinician guidance around medication prescribing.
methodsA before-and-after, retrospective cohort study comparing patients presenting to Christchurch ED with acute uncomplicated AF in the year before ('hospital-based' follow-up) and after ('community-based' follow-up) implementation of a new AF management approach. The 'community' pathway replaced hospital-based review with a next-day community follow-up and introduced more specific anticoagulation recommendations.
resultsA total of 1065 patients met inclusion criteria, with 531 presenting during the 'hospital-based' pathway period and 534 during the 'community' pathway period. The spontaneous reversion rate was approximately 61% in both cohorts. Following the implementation of the community pathway, there was no increase in cardioversions (16.6% vs 20%, difference 3.5% [95% CI -1.4 to 8.3]), admission rates (32.8% vs 32.2%, difference - 0.6% [95% CI -6.4 to 5.3]), or AEs (60-day all-cause mortality 1.3% vs 0.9%, difference - 0.7% [95% CI -2.3 to 1]). Attendance at a follow-up AF clinic improved from 92.9% to 98.1% (difference 5.2% [95% CI 0.7-9.7]). Clinician adherence to anticoagulation guidelines increased by 7% (95% CI 1.6-12.4).
conclusionsA 'rate-and-wait' strategy for managing acute uncomplicated AF continues to allow a significant proportion of patients to self-revert to sinus rhythm, without requiring hospital admission or cardioversion procedures. Transitioning to an off-site, community AF clinic is both safe and effective, demonstrating increased clinic attendance and improved adherence to anticoagulation guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.