Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342244›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2025

Costs of reproduction in flowering plants.

Marcel E Dorken, Mark van Kleunen, Marc Stift

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phenology-Dependent Sex Identification in MaturePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcel E DorkenDepartment of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, K9L 0G2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7400-5136
Mark van KleunenDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, 78464, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2861-3701
Marc StiftDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, 78464, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-9498

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-StiftungNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2018-04866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Costs of reproduction arise when investments into current reproduction reduce future reproductive fitness. Studies on reproductive costs use diverse approaches, including the analysis of gene expression, physiology, trade-offs between reproduction and growth/survival, and the impact of reproductive investments on population growth. These studies demonstrate that reproductive trade-offs have far-reaching effects on plants, affect their fitness, and are therefore important for shaping the evolution of life histories. However, not all studies have detected costs of reproduction, and c. 90% of these were conducted in natural populations, where controlling for variation in plant resource status is challenging. For dioecious plants, there is a common perception that fruit production should result in greater costs of reproduction for females than males, but divergent reproductive costs between the sexes are not supported by studies of reproductive trade-offs in dioecious plants. Other aspects of reproductive costs remain poorly understood, including ecological costs of reproduction, the fitness effects of reproductive trade-offs involving growth or physiological processes, and how the male sex role influences reproductive costs. Progress will be enabled by the use of measurements that allow for easier comparisons across studies and by more clearly distinguishing between the processes that contribute to current vs future reproductive fitness.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaFlowersGenetic FitnessReproductioncost functiondemographic costs of reproductionlife‐history trade‐offsreproductive costssex‐allocation theorysomatic costs of reproduction

Identifiers

PMID40342244
PMCPMC12138173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.