Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342208›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025

Maximizing NMR Sensitivity: A Guide to Receiver Gain Adjustment.

Josh P Peters, Frank D Sönnichsen, Jan-Bernd Hövener, Andrey N Pravdivtsev

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Josh P PetersSection Biomedical Imaging, Molecular Imaging North Competence Center (MOIN CC), Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1019-4067
Frank D SönnichsenOtto Diels Institute for Organic Chemistry, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-3755
Jan-Bernd HövenerSection Biomedical Imaging, Molecular Imaging North Competence Center (MOIN CC), Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7255-7252
Andrey N PravdivtsevSection Biomedical Imaging, Molecular Imaging North Competence Center (MOIN CC), Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8763-617X

Funding

DFG 469366436DFG 527469039DFG 555951950DFG EXC2167DFG FOR5042DFG HO-4602/2-2DFG HO-4602/3DFG HO-4602/4DFG TRR287European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01ZX1915CGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 03WIR6208AZukunftsprogramm Wirtschaft of Schleswig-Holstein 122-09-053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel methods and technology drive the rapid advances of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The primary objective of developing novel hardware is to improve sensitivity and reliability (and possibly reduce cost). Automation has made NMR much more convenient, but it may lead to trusting the algorithms without regular checks. In this contribution, we analyzed the signal and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as a function of the receiver gain (RG) for

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAlgorithmsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID40342208
PMCPMC12059252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.