ReviewEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025
Generalisation of Placebo and Nocebo Effects: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.
Review in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Top-down control of the descending pain modulatory system drives multimodal placebo analgesia.Neuron · 2026Article
- The "Are You OK?" Paradox: A Scoping Review of Nocebo and Negative Suggestion in Healthcare Communication.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Adverse effects and perceived benefits of medications in children with chronic noncancer pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePlacebo and nocebo effects are beneficial or adverse treatment outcomes upon administration of inert treatment components. These effects have been frequently studied on pain. It remains unclear to what extent generalisation occurs in these effects on pain and other somatic sensations. This review outlines the current knowledge on stimulus generalisation (i.e., generalisation over various stimuli) and response generalisation (i.e., generalisation over various responses) of placebo and nocebo effects on prevalent somatic sensations (i.e., pain, itch, dyspnea, nausea and fatigue). DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: The databases PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles reporting on experimental studies in humans of the induction and generalisation of placebo and nocebo effects on prevalent somatic sensations.
resultsOf 2025 records identified, 23 studies were included. These studies indicated that placebo and nocebo effects can generalise over stimuli (at perceptual, categorical and treatment levels) and over responses within modalities. Most studies investigated pain; fewer studies investigated itch, dyspnea, nausea and fatigue. Generalisation effects tend to be larger when the generalisation stimuli and responses more closely resemble the initial stimulus or response. Generalisation was more likely if a combination of verbal suggestion and conditioning was employed to induce placebo or nocebo effects than if either suggestion or conditioning was employed alone. Response generalisation across modalities remains unclear.
conclusionsPlacebo and nocebo effects can generalise over stimuli and responses. More experimental and clinical research is warranted to address carryover effects of placebo and nocebo effects. SIGNIFICANCE: The current review provides an overview of the literature on the generalisation of placebo and nocebo effects to diverse stimuli and responses. This can ultimately benefit healthcare providers to prevent carryover effects of treatment failure and harness carryover effects of treatment success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.