ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2025
Measures of nutrition intake and growth reported in preterm nutrition studies: A scoping review.
Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measures of nutrition intake and growth reported in preterm nutrition studies: A scoping review.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are inconsistent recommendations in available guidelines and uncertainty regarding the exact nutrient requirements for preterm infants, partly because of inconsistent outcome reporting in nutrition intervention studies. To support development of a minimum reporting set, we undertook a scoping review to identify measures of nutrition intake and growth outcomes reported in recent preterm nutrition studies. We searched for publications from 2018 to 2023 reporting individuals born preterm at any gestational age and study location whose nutrition intake was assessed before first hospital discharge and whose growth was assessed at any age. One reviewer screened articles and extracted the measures. Any uncertainties were resolved by a second reviewer. The results were tabulated and analyzed descriptively. We identified 6365 records, and included 250 studies. Only 10 of 236 studies (4%) reported how nutrition intake was calculated. There were five different ways of reporting weight and 13 of weight gain, each at many different time points. Furthermore, 27 of 105 studies (26%) did not report how weight gain was calculated, and those that did reported five different calculation methods. Our findings demonstrate significant variation and incomplete reporting of nutrition intake and growth outcomes in preterm nutrition studies. This lack of standardization limits the utility of existing evidence and highlights the need for a standardized reporting framework to improve comparability and support evidence-based guidelines in preterm nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.