Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342174›Full record

ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2025

Measures of nutrition intake and growth reported in preterm nutrition studies: A scoping review.

Meiliana Meiliana, Frank H Bloomfield, Jane E Harding, Luling Lin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meiliana MeilianaLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3907-0826
Frank H BloomfieldLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-6577
Jane E HardingLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Luling LinLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are inconsistent recommendations in available guidelines and uncertainty regarding the exact nutrient requirements for preterm infants, partly because of inconsistent outcome reporting in nutrition intervention studies. To support development of a minimum reporting set, we undertook a scoping review to identify measures of nutrition intake and growth outcomes reported in recent preterm nutrition studies. We searched for publications from 2018 to 2023 reporting individuals born preterm at any gestational age and study location whose nutrition intake was assessed before first hospital discharge and whose growth was assessed at any age. One reviewer screened articles and extracted the measures. Any uncertainties were resolved by a second reviewer. The results were tabulated and analyzed descriptively. We identified 6365 records, and included 250 studies. Only 10 of 236 studies (4%) reported how nutrition intake was calculated. There were five different ways of reporting weight and 13 of weight gain, each at many different time points. Furthermore, 27 of 105 studies (26%) did not report how weight gain was calculated, and those that did reported five different calculation methods. Our findings demonstrate significant variation and incomplete reporting of nutrition intake and growth outcomes in preterm nutrition studies. This lack of standardization limits the utility of existing evidence and highlights the need for a standardized reporting framework to improve comparability and support evidence-based guidelines in preterm nutrition.

Indexed as

Infant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, PrematureGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornNutritional RequirementsNutritional StatusWeight Gainenteral nutritionlife cycleneonatesnutritionparenteral nutritionpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID40342174
PMCPMC12512005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.