Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342154›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2025

A Comprehensive Model for Separating Systematic Bias and Noise in Metabolomic Timecourse Data-A Nonlinear B-Spline Mixed-Effects Approach.

Kathy Sharon Isaac, Stanislav Sokolenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathy Sharon IsaacDepartment of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9154-2128
Stanislav SokolenkoDepartment of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-8282

Funding

We acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), [RGPIN-2019-04694].
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The simultaneous detection of tens to hundreds of metabolites in a single metabolomic timecourse sample offers a unique but often unrealized opportunity for quantification validation. An individual timecourse fit for each metabolite fundamentally convolutes measurement noise with systematic sample bias (stemming from, for example, variable sample dilution, extraction, and normalization). However, since systematic bias, by its definition, influences all metabolites within a sample in a similar fashion, it can be identified and corrected through the simultaneous fit of all detected metabolites in a single timecourse model. This study presents a nonlinear B-spline mixed-effects model as a convenient formulation capable of estimating and correcting such bias. The proposed model was successfully applied to real cell culture data and validated using simulated timecourse data perturbed with varying degrees of random noise and systematic bias. The model was able to accurately correct systematic bias of 3%-10% to within 0.5% on average for typical data. An R package for the correction model has been developed to facilitate model adoption and use. The proposed nonlinear B-spline mixed-effects formulation is general enough for application to a broad range of research areas beyond just cell culture metabolomics.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsModels, BiologicalAnimalsBatch Cell Culture TechniquesSf9 CellsSpodopteraTime FactorsB‐splinecell culturemetabolomicsmixed‐effectssystematic bias

Identifiers

PMID40342154
PMCPMC12235215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.