ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2025
A Comprehensive Model for Separating Systematic Bias and Noise in Metabolomic Timecourse Data-A Nonlinear B-Spline Mixed-Effects Approach.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The simultaneous detection of tens to hundreds of metabolites in a single metabolomic timecourse sample offers a unique but often unrealized opportunity for quantification validation. An individual timecourse fit for each metabolite fundamentally convolutes measurement noise with systematic sample bias (stemming from, for example, variable sample dilution, extraction, and normalization). However, since systematic bias, by its definition, influences all metabolites within a sample in a similar fashion, it can be identified and corrected through the simultaneous fit of all detected metabolites in a single timecourse model. This study presents a nonlinear B-spline mixed-effects model as a convenient formulation capable of estimating and correcting such bias. The proposed model was successfully applied to real cell culture data and validated using simulated timecourse data perturbed with varying degrees of random noise and systematic bias. The model was able to accurately correct systematic bias of 3%-10% to within 0.5% on average for typical data. An R package for the correction model has been developed to facilitate model adoption and use. The proposed nonlinear B-spline mixed-effects formulation is general enough for application to a broad range of research areas beyond just cell culture metabolomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.