ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2025
The Holm and Cordoba Urinary Tract Infection Score: Translation, Linguistic and Content Validation of the German Version of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Symptoms, Bothersomeness and Impact of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women.
Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Danish Holm and Cordoba Urinary Tract Infection Score (HCUTI) assessing symptom severity, bothersomeness and impact of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) on daily activities in women is a promising patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for use in future research. For potential application in Germany, the present study aimed (i) to perform translation and linguistic validation of the HCUTI, and (ii) to assess content validity of the German version of the HCUTI.
methodsTranslation and linguistic validation was performed using the dual-panel method. A bilingual panel of nonprofessional Danish-German speaking persons translated the HCUTI, and the translated version was evaluated regarding comprehensibility by a lay panel of native German-speaking women with past uUTI. Content validity of the German version of the HCUTI was assessed according to the criteria of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. In individual cognitive interviews, women with a history of uUTI and experts from different medical fields rated the instructions, items, response options and recall period of the HCUTI in terms of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility.
resultsTranslation and linguistic validation resulted in a German version of the HCUTI which lay persons considered easy to understand. In content validity assessments, participants rated the questionnaire as generally relevant and comprehensive. One item was removed due to lack of relevance. The response options were linguistically modified, and a dichotomous scale was introduced for 10 items on symptoms. To enhance comprehensibility, eight items on symptoms and bothersomeness, and one item on daily activities were slightly reformulated. After modification, the German version of the HCUTI includes 18 items on symptoms, 18 items on bothersomeness, and six items on impact on daily activities. The study team reviewed and linguistically standardized the final version of the questionnaire to ensure consistency in wording and sentence structure across all items.
conclusionsThe German version of the HCUTI is a suitable tool to assess symptoms, bothersomeness and impact of uUTIs in women. Data on psychometric properties of the instrument will be collected in a subsequent survey among women with uUTIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.