ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Concurrent pathological scar: independent risk factor for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsEsophageal stricture is a common complication after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Pathological scars may predict stricture development, but clinical studies exploring their relationship are limited. This study aimed to investigate the link between concurrent pathological scarring and post-ESD esophageal stricture and develop a predictive risk model.
methodsThis retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent ESD for superficial esophageal lesions (SELs) over the past decade. Data on demographics, endoscopy, pathology, and concurrent scarring were collected. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors, followed by validation using subgroup analysis and propensity score matching. A nomogram was developed and internally validated.
resultsOf 255 patients, 28 (11.0%) developed esophageal stricture. Multivariate logistic regression identified concurrent pathological scarring as an independent risk factor for stricture development (OR 96.520 [10.641-875.536], p < 0.001). Additional risk factors included lesions in the upper esophagus, lesions longer than 4 cm, circumferential involvement over 50%, infiltration depth beyond the epithelium, and muscular layer injury during the procedure. A predictive model incorporating these factors was developed, demonstrating high discriminative ability (AUC 0.943 [0.902-0.984]) with an optimal cutoff of 135.6, sensitivity of 82.4%, and specificity of 94.3%. The calibration curve showed good accuracy.
conclusionsConcurrent pathological scarring is an independent risk factor for post-ESD esophageal stricture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40342096What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.