ReviewInternational journal of oncology2025
Strategies for neoantigen screening and immunogenicity validation in cancer immunotherapy (Review).
Review in International journal of oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay as a gatekeeper of neoantigen expression: Bridging RNA surveillance and tumor immunotherapy.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Molecular profile of residual triple-negative breast cancer: opportunities for post-neoadjuvant therapeutic interventions.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Immunoinformatics-driven multi-epitope vaccine design targeting PSMA, STEAP1, and B7H3 for prostate cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- AI-driven genotype-phenotype modeling: a framework integrating multi-modal single-cell genomics and reverse vaccinology forFrontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- RNA-based cancer vaccines: mechanisms, clinical progress, and translational challenges.Immunologic research · 2025Review
- Next-Generation mRNA Vaccines in Melanoma: Advances in Delivery and Combination Strategies.Cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy stimulates and enhances antitumor immune responses to eliminate cancer cells. Neoantigens, which originate from specific mutations within tumor cells, are key targets in cancer immunotherapy. Neoantigens manifest as abnormal peptide fragments or protein segments that are uniquely expressed in tumor cells, making them highly immunogenic. As a result, they activate the immune system, particularly T cell‑mediated immune responses, effectively identifying and eliminating tumor cells. Certain tumor‑associated antigens that are abnormally expressed in normal host proteins in cancer cells are promising targets for immunotherapy. Neoantigens derived from mutated proteins in cancer cells offer true cancer specificity and are often highly immunogenic. Furthermore, most neoantigens are unique to each patient, highlighting the need for personalized treatment strategies. The precise identification and screening of neoantigens are key for improving treatment efficacy and developing individualized therapeutic plans. The neoantigen prediction process involves somatic mutation identification, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing, peptide processing and peptide‑HLA binding prediction. The present review summarizes the major current methods used for neoantigen screening, available computational tools and the advantages and limitations of various techniques. Additionally, the present review aimed to summarize experimental strategies for validating the immunogenicity of the predicted neoantigens, which will determine whether these neoantigens can effectively trigger immune responses, as well as challenges encountered during neoantigen screening, providing relevant recommendations for the optimization of neoantigen‑based immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.