Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342039›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2025

Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Lidocaine for Sustained Postoperative Analgesia in Adults.

Kenyon W Osborne, Wiremu S MacFater, Brian J Anderson, Darren Svirskis, Andrew G Hill, Jacqueline A Hannam

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kenyon W OsborneDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4586-8973
Wiremu S MacFaterDepartment of Surgery, South Auckland Clinical Campus, Middlemore Hospital, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9323-7036
Brian J AndersonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-3019
Darren SvirskisSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9435-1773
Andrew G HillDepartment of Surgery, South Auckland Clinical Campus, Middlemore Hospital, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8672-6379
Jacqueline A HannamDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. j.hannam@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-7397

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 18-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIntraperitoneal lidocaine is an emerging strategy for analgesia following abdominal surgery but its pharmacokinetics are poorly quantified. We aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic model for unbound and total lidocaine by intraperitoneal and intravenous routes.

methodsUnbound and total lidocaine concentrations, and pain scores (visual analogue score 0-10) were from a published randomized control trial of adults (n = 56) undergoing laparoscopic colon resection. Participants received intravenous or intraperitoneal lidocaine (2 mg/kg bolus then 1.5 mg/kg/h infusion) for 72 h postoperatively. Data were pooled with literature-derived alpha-1-acid glycoprotein concentrations (AAG) to support total lidocaine modelling. Unbound kinetics were described using compartmental models with first order absorption between intraperitoneal and plasma compartments. A turnover model described AAG kinetics with constant binding to lidocaine. An inhibitory pharmacodynamic model was explored to link concentration to pain scores.

resultsMaximum lidocaine concentrations after intraperitoneal administration were means (range) of 3.0 (0.4-4.5) mg/L total and 0.6 (0.1-0.9) mg/L unbound. Intraperitoneal absorption was incomplete (bioavailability = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-0.76) with a half-time of 0.5 (0.4-0.8) h. A two-compartment model with first order elimination fit best, with unbound clearance 121 (108-136) L/h/70 kg. The binding constant to AAG (K

conclusionsA third of the intraperitoneal dose did not reach the central compartment and absorption took ~2 h. Simulations show that 2 mg/kg/h intraperitoneal infusion achieves a 5-point pain score reduction within ~36 min.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalLidocainePostoperative PainAdultAgedBiological AvailabilityFemaleHumansInfusions, ParenteralInjections, IntraperitonealMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalOrosomucoidPain MeasurementAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineOrosomucoid

Identifiers

PMID40342039
PMCPMC12227458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.