ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of cinobufacin-based combination therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors with a rising incidence in recent years. In China, it ranks as the fourth most prevalent malignancy. Although surgery is the primary treatment, many advanced-stage patients are ineligible due to late diagnosis, rapid progression, or other contraindications. Targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are common non-surgical approaches, but these often result in significant side effects such as gastrointestinal reactions, bone marrow suppression, and high recurrence rates. In this context, integrative treatment with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has shown promise. Cinobufacin, a TCM drug developed in China, has demonstrated superior efficacy and safety when combined with Western treatments in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cinobufacin combined with conventional Western treatments to Western treatments alone in advanced HCC patients. The search covered all databases up to December 30, 2024. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 15.0, and Review Manager.
resultsA total of 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Cinobufacin combination therapy significantly improved the disease control rate (DCR, OR = 2.49, 95% CI 2.01 to 3.07), reduced alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (SMD = - 1.86, 95% CI - 2.58 to - 1.13), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (SMD = - 1.66, 95% CI - 2.48 to - 0.83), and total bilirubin (TBIL) levels (SMD = - 1.82, 95% CI - 2.36 to - 1.28). It also increased white blood cell (WBC) counts (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.11) and improved Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores (SMD = 1.24, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.56). Funnel plots and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results.
conclusionCinobufacin combined with Western treatments significantly improves clinical efficacy, reduces adverse drug reactions, and enhances the quality of life for patients with advanced HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.