Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341982›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Modified Dice Coefficients for Evaluation of Tumor Segmentation from PET Images: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Oona Rainio, Riku Klén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oona RainioTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. ormrai@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-7656
Riku KlénTurku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-8360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) is the most common evaluation metric used for image segmentation but it is not always ideal. Namely, the DSC values only depend on the number of misplaced elements instead of their location with respect to the correct segments. Because of this, the DSC is ill-suited for such tasks where the correct location of the borders of an object is difficult to define in an objective way, as is the case in tumor segmentation in positron emission tomography (PET) images. To avoid this issue, we introduce two different modifications of the DSC, one with weights and one with an additional loss term, which also evaluate the distance between the real and the predicted segments. We computed the values of DSC and our new coefficient from 191 predicted tumor segmentation masks created by using PET images of 89 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. We compared the values of all three coefficients with the scores given to these masks by human evaluators. According to our results, the weighted modification of DSC had a higher correlation with the scores given by the human evaluators than the original DSC, and it also produced significantly less variation within the two highest score classes (p-value

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographyAlgorithmsHumansProof of Concept StudyConvolutional neural networkDice coefficientMedical imagingPositron emission tomographyTumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40341982
PMCPMC12920985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.