Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341967›Full record

ArticleOecologia2025

Scale dependent niche conservatism in fish communities of the largest freshwater lake in China.

Tingyue Yang, Lan Zhu, Dan Yu, Chunling Wang, Masami Fujiwara, Qinghua Cai, Huanzhang Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tingyue YangState Key Laboratory of Breeding Biotechnology and Sustainable Aquaculture, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Lan ZhuState Key Laboratory of Breeding Biotechnology and Sustainable Aquaculture, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Dan YuState Key Laboratory of Breeding Biotechnology and Sustainable Aquaculture, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Chunling WangState Key Laboratory of Breeding Biotechnology and Sustainable Aquaculture, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Masami FujiwaraDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2258, USA.
Qinghua CaiState Key Laboratory of Breeding Biotechnology and Sustainable Aquaculture, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Huanzhang LiuState Key Laboratory of Breeding Biotechnology and Sustainable Aquaculture, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China. hzliu@ihb.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-7686

Funding

Hubei Key Laboratory of Wudang Local Chinese Medicine Research HB2020B19National Natural Science Foundation of China 32201425National Natural Science Foundation of China 32473167Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program 2022FY100400The research program of China Three Gorges Corporation 201903144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two major theoretical concepts of niche evolution lead to conflicting predictions in ecological studies: the competitive exclusion principle (CEP) predicts that closely-related species should be sufficiently divergent to coexist, whereas niche conservatism (NC) suggests that closely-related species should be more ecologically similar. Here, we test this conundrum by employing stable isotope ratios (δ

Indexed as

EcosystemFishesLakesAnimalsChinaPhylogenyCompetitive exclusion principleNiche conservatismNiche evolutionStable isotopeTrophic niche

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.