ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Sexual relationship power, intimate partner violence and dyadic adjustment during pregnancy and affecting factors.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was conducted to investigate issues such as sexual relationship power, intimate partner violence and dyadic adjustment during pregnancy and affecting factors.
methodsThe study data were collected by administering the Pregnant Women Information Form, Sexual Relationship Power Scale (SRPS), Intimate Partner Violence Attitude Scale (IPVAS)-Revised and Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS).
resultsThe mean scores the participating pregnant women obtained from the overall SRPS, IPVAS - Revised and RDAS were 3.06 ± 0.48, 49.03 ± 12.03 and 54.49 ± 8.17, respectively. While sexual relationship power was positively correlated with dyadic adjustment, intimate partner violence was negatively associated with dyadic adjustment. Factors influencing SRPS scores were education level, employment status, husband's alcohol use, and exposure to physical violence. Factors affecting dyadic adjustment were husband's education level, occupation, pregnancy trimester, number of pregnancies, sexual relationship power, and intimate partner violence attitudes.
conclusionWhile the husbands' characteristics such as education and profession affected the dyadic adjustment, the pregnant women's attitudes towards dominance in sexual life and violence in the intimate relationships were the predictors of the dyadic adjustment. Based on these findings, interventions aimed at increasing women's sexual relationship power and reducing intimate partner violence during pregnancy may support dyadic adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.