ReviewNature medicine2025
RANO criteria for response assessment of brain metastases based on amino acid PET imaging.
Review in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatment modalities in recurrent brain metastases: a combined institutional and individual patient data meta-analysis of post-recurrence survival and local progression-free survival.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Distinguishing true progression from treatment effects in glioblastoma: a practical, evidence-graded imaging framework for the multidisciplinary team.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Preliminary clinical investigation ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Molecular Brain Tumor Imaging Beyond [AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2026Review
- Cutting-edge approaches in pet imaging for gliomas: current applications for neurooncologists and the path to theranostic breakthroughs.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- The evolving landscape of brain metastasis: volume II.Trends in cancer · 2026Review
- Mechanisms, Imaging Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Advances of Neovascularization in Brain Metastases.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The evolving landscape of leptomeningeal metastases from NSCLC: an international, contemporary, multicenter cohort study.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic stratification of newly diagnosed IDH-mutant gliomas by [18F]fluoroethyltyrosine and [11C]methionine PET: A retrospective, bicentric cohort study.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2009-2025: Broad scope and implementation-A progress report.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Update to the RANO Working Group and EANO recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Availability and use of PET in patients with brain tumours - a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Brain Tumour Group (EORTC-BTG) survey.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Auxiliary Value of [Cancers · 2025Article
- Novel PET RANO BM 1.0 criteria: Regulatory perspectives on new endpoint definitions in brain metastases.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- The role of FET-PET in patient selection and response assessment for reirradiation in recurrent glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Drawing parallels between amyloid PET in Alzheimer's disease and amino acid PET in primary and secondary brain tumors.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities are needed to improve medical care and outcome of patients with brain metastases, a frequent and severe complication of several cancer types. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary method used for detection, treatment planning and disease monitoring in patients with brain metastases, but this method has limitations. These limitations mean that MRI can inform on lesion size but cannot directly measure the activity or viability of tumor tissue. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, however, can visualize metabolically active tumor cells and is therefore increasingly incorporated into cancer care to assess tumor burden and response to treatment. Here, we define the PET Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) for brain metastasis (BM) 1.0 criteria for metabolic response assessment of brain metastases using amino acid PET. By introducing an innovative endpoint for next-generation clinical trials, the PET RANO BM 1.0 criteria aim to facilitate development of novel therapies for patients with brain metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40341837What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.