Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341829›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Adaptive optimization of natural coagulants using hybrid machine learning approach for sustainable water treatment.

Pallavi Randive, Madhuri S Bhagat, Mangesh P Bhorkar, Rajesh M Bhagat, Shilpa M Vinchurkar, Sagar Shelare, Shubham Sharma, N Beemkumar, S Hemalatha, Parveen Kumar and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pallavi RandiveCivil Engineering Department, KDK College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440024, India.
Madhuri S BhagatCivil Engineering Department, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering (YCCE), Nagpur, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 441110, India.
Mangesh P BhorkarDepartment of Civil Engineering, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440016, India.
Rajesh M BhagatCivil Engineering Department, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering (YCCE), Nagpur, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 441110, India.
Shilpa M VinchurkarMechanical Engineering Department, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440016, India.
Sagar ShelareDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Priyadarshini College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440019, India. sagmech24@gmail.com.
Shubham SharmaCentre for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140401, India. shubham543sharma@gmail.com.
N BeemkumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed to Be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
S HemalathaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Raghu Engineering College, Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 531162, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9569-6922
Parveen KumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Chandigarh College of Engineering, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri, Mohali, Punjab, 140307, India.
Ankit KediaDepartment of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, NIMS Institute of Engineering & Technology, NIMS University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Ehab El Sayed MassoudCollege of Applied Sciences, Dhahran Al-Janoub, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Deepak GuptaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248002, India.
Jasmina LozanovicDepartment of Engineering, FH Campus Wien - University of Applied Sciences, Clinical Engineering, Favoritenstraße 226, B.3.01, 1100, Vienna, Austria. jasmina.lozanovic@fh-campuswien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficiency optimization methods for natural coagulants are often restricted due to non-scientific trial-and-error approaches. They are inaccurate in predicting the complex interactions of jet mixing parameters, coagulant dosage, and environmental conditions. To overcome these obstacles, this research paper proposes advanced hybrid models in machine learning to enhance flocculation efficiency. We use the CatBoost model with the NTK to learn the intricate nonlinear interactions among jet velocity, mixing time, coagulant dose, pH, and turbidity. CatBoost is effective for dealing with categorical data like diverse coagulants. Meanwhile, NTK boosts the model's generalization capability, especially when the sample size becomes small or experimental datasets are applied. Lastly, SOMs and MARS are used to identify pattern recognitions in tracing the crucial interaction among mixing parameters. Reinforcement learning techniques-that include DDPG and SAC for dynamic optimization of jet velocity, mixing time, and coagulant dosage-optimize the model in real time. Utilizing NAS and Hyperband to automate model tuning, the timestamp was reduced by 40%. The proposed models heavily improve the efficiency of the flocculation process by 20-25% and allow for a good predictive accuracy of 95-97%. Paramount, however, is that the model has interpretability properties assured by SHAP and counterfactual explanations, which would give actionable insights into the most influencing factors on the efficiency of flocculation. This work represents a substantial advancement for the discipline since it introduces robust, interpretable, and real-time optimization methods to offer a practical tool through which improvement of water treatment processes would be made both sustainable and efficient.

Indexed as

CatBoostFlocculationJet mixingMachine learningReinforcement learningScenarios

Identifiers

PMID40341829
PMCPMC12062499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.