ReviewInternational journal of immunogenetics2025
The Quest for Antibodies and Other Acquired Immune Receptors: A Historical Perspective.
Review in International journal of immunogenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diversity of antibody molecules has for decades been an unsolved enigma that has attracted wide interest among biologists. Parallel to the accumulation of experimental evidence, progress in antibody research was also driven by the theoretical debate that played a particularly prominent role, at least until the entry of molecular biology into this field of investigation. Several publications have examined this topic from a historical perspective. In this article, we aim to examine the history of research into the mechanisms underlying antibody diversity from a partly new standpoint. In jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes), progressively more distant on the evolutionary scale from humans and mice-in non-model mammals, birds, amphibians, bony and cartilaginous fish-certain mechanisms for the diversity of acquired immunity receptors (B-cell receptors [BCR]/immunoglobulins [Ig] and T-cell receptors [TCR]) have been described that are quite unexpected on the basis of what has emerged from biomedical immunology studies. What is more, in Agnatha vertebrates, in several invertebrate phyla and even in bacteria, forms of adaptive immunity have been discovered, based on the ability to finely tune the host defence response to the infectious threats. These defence systems show some similarities with the acquired immunity of jawed vertebrates, although they are based on mechanisms and receptors totally different from BCR/Ig and TCR. Therefore, our aim is to investigate how the theoretical debate on antibody diversity, which developed in the 20th century, partly anticipated some of the central themes in the current research on adaptive immunity systems discovered in the previously mentioned non-model systems. With this aim, we have reformulated, in the language of modern biology, some of the hypotheses advanced in the first decades of antibody diversity research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.