ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of intra-fractional CBCT image quality using different megavoltage beam sizes and imaging conditions in a phantom study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intra-fractional cone beam computed tomography can provide real-time anatomical information while saving treatment time, leading to important breakthroughs in image-guided radiation therapy. However, MV-level photon scattering during the image acquisition will disrupt the image quality. We obtained intra-fractional cone beam computed tomography images of a standard phantom using different sizes of MV-beam and imaging conditions such as imaging time, tube current and tube voltage. We analyzed the uniformity index, noise power spectrum, low contrast visibility and spatial resolution of the images to investigate the effect of MV-level photon scattering on the image quality of intra-fractional cone beam computed tomography. It was found that these parameters of the images varied regularly with the size of the MV-beam, which can help us to predict in advance whether the quality of the images meets the clinical requirements based on the radiation treatment plan to decide whether to use intra-fractional cone beam computed tomography. The research also shows that the different imaging conditions can improve or deteriorate the image parameter, which can also help us choose reasonable imaging conditions to obtain better image quality according to the clinical situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.