ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Preserving full spectrum information in imaging mass spectrometry data reduction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unmixing of Imaging Mass Spectrometry Measurements Using Microscopy-Informed Constraints.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationImaging mass spectrometry (IMS) has become an important tool for molecular characterization of biological tissue. However, IMS experiments tend to yield large datasets, routinely recording over 200 000 ion intensity values per mass spectrum and more than 100 000 pixels, i.e. spectra, per dataset. Traditionally, IMS data size challenges have been addressed by feature selection or extraction, such as by peak picking and peak integration. Selective data reduction techniques such as peak picking only retain certain parts of a mass spectrum, and often these describe only medium-to-high-abundance species. Since lower-intensity peaks and, for example, near-isobar species are sometimes missed, selective methods can potentially bias downstream analysis toward a subset of species in the data rather than considering all species measured.
resultsWe present an alternative to selective data reduction of IMS data that achieves similar data size reduction while better conserving the ion intensity profiles across all recorded m/z-bins, thereby preserving full spectrum information. Our method utilizes a low-rank matrix completion model combined with a randomized sparse-format-aware algorithm to approximate IMS datasets. This representation offers reduced dimensionality and a data footprint comparable to peak picking but also captures complete spectral profiles, enabling comprehensive analysis and compression. We demonstrate improved preservation of lower signal-to-noise ratio signals and near-isobars, mitigation of selection bias, and reduced information loss compared to current state-of-the-art data reduction methods in IMS. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code is available at https://github.com/vandeplaslab/full_profile and data are available at https://doi.org/10.4121/a6efd47a-b4ec-493e-a742-70e8a369f788.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.