ArticlePloS one2025
The impact of outpatient settlement for cross-regional medical treatment on healthcare choice by the floating population: PSM+DID evidence based on CFPS.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of cross-provincial healthcare utilization among hospitalized patients in a tertiary Chinese medicine hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Effects of the multidomain non-pharmacological interventions on anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms in older adults with suspected cognitive impairment: a propensity score matching and difference-in-differences analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Analysis of nationwide availability of negotiated drugs in China's National Reimbursement Drug List.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The issue of regional disparities in medical resources and insurance benefits is notably prevalent in China. As a result, seeking medical treatment across regions has emerged as a focal point of health reform efforts in recent years. This study examines the impact of outpatient settlement for cross-regional medical treatment on healthcare choices by the floating population who live and work in regions different from their registered residence. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), this study conducts an empirical analysis through Propensity Score Matching and Difference-in-Differences (PSM + DID). The analysis included a sample of 3,019 floating population from 2012 to 2020. The findings indicate that they are significantly more inclined to select advanced medical institution (coefficient = 0.252, p < 0.05) due to the influence of the policy. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis reveals that this policy primarily affects the labor force (coefficient = 0.268, p < 0.05) and urban residents (coefficient = 0.286, p < 0.05) within the floating population. Ultimately, the outpatient settlement for cross-regional medical treatment affects the floating population to seek care at advanced medical institution, which conflicts with the objectives of the hierarchical medical system. Policymakers should enhance communication to ensure better coordination between these policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.