ArticleDermatology reports2025
The efficacy of apremilast in pemphigus: a systematic review of case reports.
Article in Dermatology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: Therapeutic Update.Drugs · 2026Review
- Plakoglobin phosphorylation at serine 665 is capable of stabilizing cadherin-mediated adhesion in keratinocytes.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Autoimmune Diseases of the Eyelid Skin: Molecular Pathways, Clinical Manifestations, and Therapeutic Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pemphigus is a severe autoimmune blistering disorder that significantly affects patients' quality of life. While corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents are commonly used, they have substantial side effects, highlighting the need for safer alternatives. Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, has shown efficacy in treating other autoimmune diseases and may offer promise for pemphigus. This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes, safety, and potential role of apremilast in the treatment of pemphigus by synthesizing available case reports and series. A literature search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar) for case reports and series involving apremilast in pemphigus. Inclusion criteria were a confirmed pemphigus diagnosis and apremilast treatment. Five studies (four case reports and one case series) involving 7 patients were included. Apremilast led to significant clinical improvement in 4 patients, with reductions in disease activity, lesion severity, and symptom scores (Pemphigus Disease Area Index [PDAI], Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score [ABSIS], Visual Analog Scale [VAS], and Numerical Rating Score [NRS]). Increases in regulatory T cells and decreases in anti-desmoglein antibodies were observed. No serious adverse events were reported, although one study noted treatment failure, possibly due to short follow-up or concurrent infections. Apremilast appears to be a promising treatment for therapy-resistant or corticosteroid-intolerant pemphigus patients. Although the evidence is limited, it supports apremilast's efficacy and favorable safety profile. Further research with larger sample sizes and randomized controlled trials is necessary to confirm these findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.