ArticlePloS one2025
Developing the DigIQ: A measure of digital competence.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital literacy and subjective wellbeing of young people: a mixed-methods approach based on SEM and fsQCA.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital competence reflects the skills and knowledge needed to thrive in the digital world. Despite the criticality of this concept, the field lacks a robust and valid measure of digital competence that is suitable across the life span. Addressing this need, using data from more than 2500 participants across three studies, this work presents the development of the DigIQ - a psychometrically valid indicator of digital competence for use across the lifespan. The measure reflects the complexity of digital competence - covering nine skill domains (strategic information skills, critical information skills, netiquette, digital content creation skills, safety and control of information and devices, digital health and wellbeing, sustainable/green digital skills, digital problem-solving skills, and AI skills) and related digital knowledge. While promising, results highlight important future considerations - namely, the need to assess the tool's suitability for younger demographics and individuals with limited literacy skills; the importance of complementing this tool with more nuanced indicators when making interpretations across age groups; and the need to adapt this tool to reflect emerging technological developments. Still, even with these caveats, the DigIQ represents an important advance in digital competence assessment, and thanks to its open access approach, can widely inform evidence-based decision-making and promote digital competence in an increasingly digitized world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.