ArticlePloS one2025
Anatomically distinct cortical tracking of music and speech by slow (1-8Hz) and fast (70-120Hz) oscillatory activity.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- I Can't Hear You Both at the Same Time: A Temporal Dilemma During Inter-Regional Communication.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Human auditory cortex preferentially tracks speech over music without explicit attention.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Music and speech encode hierarchically organized structural complexity at the service of human expressiveness and communication. Previous research has shown that populations of neurons in auditory regions track the envelope of acoustic signals within the range of slow and fast oscillatory activity. However, the extent to which cortical tracking is influenced by the interplay between stimulus type, frequency band, and brain anatomy remains an open question. In this study, we reanalyzed intracranial recordings from thirty subjects implanted with electrocorticography (ECoG) grids in the left cerebral hemisphere, drawn from an existing open-access ECoG database. Participants passively watched a movie where visual scenes were accompanied by either music or speech stimuli. Cross-correlation between brain activity and the envelope of music and speech signals, along with density-based clustering analyses and linear mixed-effects modeling, revealed both anatomically overlapping and functionally distinct mapping of the tracking effect as a function of stimulus type and frequency band. We observed widespread left-hemisphere tracking of music and speech signals in the Slow Frequency Band (SFB, band-passed filtered low-frequency signal between 1-8Hz), with near zero temporal lags. In contrast, cortical tracking in the High Frequency Band (HFB, envelope of the 70-120Hz band-passed filtered signal) was higher during speech perception, was more densely concentrated in classical language processing areas, and showed a frontal-to-temporal gradient in lag values that was not observed during perception of musical stimuli. Our results highlight a complex interaction between cortical region and frequency band that shapes temporal dynamics during processing of naturalistic music and speech signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.