Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341720›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2025

Reconciling security and care in digital medicine.

Chiara Carboni, Celia Brightwell, Orit Halpern, Oscar Freyer, Stephen Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical AI is Not (Yet) Trustworthy-But It Could Be.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  2. The Eurostack of digital health cybersecurity.Frontiers in digital health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chiara CarboniChair of Digital Cultures, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, TU Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Celia BrightwellChair of Digital Cultures, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, TU Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany. celia.brightwell@tu-dresden.de.
Orit HalpernChair of Digital Cultures, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, TU Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Oscar FreyerElse Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty, TU Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Stephen GilbertElse Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty, TU Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.

Funding

European Commission, Horizon Europe Program 101094218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common approaches to cybersecurity frame end users as the weakest link in a system. In this Perspective, we argue that appraising end users as contributors to security can help reconcile both security and care practices. Through two case studies, including Swedish hospitals and a UK smart-home system, we demonstrate the gaps between established security protocols and the daily reality of care practices, and outline approaches to reconcile security and care.

Identifiers

PMID40341720
PMCPMC12062445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.