ArticleScientific reports2025
The role of silver nanoparticles in yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus L.) defense response to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lupini.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrastructural changes and defense strategy of yellow lupine during silver nanoparticle and Fusarium oxysporum interaction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Plant-Derived Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery: A Unified Framework Integrating Extracellular Vesicles, Engineered Phytocarriers, Hybrid Platforms, and Bioinspired Systems.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents the influence of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on the growth of yellow lupine (Lupinus luteus L.cv. Diament and Lupinus luteus L.cv. Mister), and some metabolic reactions triggered by AgNPs during the seed germination stage and development of the seedling. Also, the role of AgNPs in defense mechanisms of the above of yellow lupine varieties against hemibiotrofic patogen Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lupini. AgNPs enhanced the growth of yellow lupine seedlings, particularly root length and fresh biomass. Furthermore, AgNPs triggered defense-related phytohormones, such as abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonates (JA/MeJA), and salicylic acid (SA), which were involved in defense response of yellow lupine against F. oxysporum infection. The application of AgNPs significantly enhanced the growth of yellow lupine seedlings, increasing root length by over 400% and fresh biomass by 183% compared to the control. Moreover, AgNPs also significantly triggered an important defense-related phytohormone ABA, which increased by 103- and 38-times in Diament and Mister varieties, respectively. AgNPs influenced soluble sugar levels, such as sucrose and fructose, in yellow lupine, which may be related to defense mechanisms. The treatment with AgNPs induced a hormetic effect, where the roots of seedlings exhibited increased growth and defense responses at low concentrations. The level of gibberellic acid (GA) increased by 556% and 297% in AgNP-pretreated embryo axes of Diament and Mister varieties, respectively. Sugar levels, such as sucrose and fructose, were also influenced by AgNPs. In Diament variety, sucrose and fructose levels increased by 60% and 146%, respectively. However, F. oxysporum infection caused a strong decline in sugar levels. Overall, the study suggests that AgNPs can be used to enhance plant growth and defense against pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.