ArticleScientific reports2025
Bioimpedance assessment method based on back propagation neural network for irreversible electroporation of liver tissue.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and Efficacy of an Irreversible Electroporation System with Real-Time Electrical and Thermal Monitoring for Liver Tumors: A Bicentric Retrospective Study.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Observational
- Distribution of relaxation times as a tool to monitor tissue electroporation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) in tumor therapy has been validated over many years by clinical application. An in-depth study, however, is required to assess the degree of ablation during the clinical dissemination of the treatment. In this study, we propose and validate a method to evaluate the degree of IRE by measuring the impedance spectra of tissues before and after pulsed electric field treatment. IRE with varying parameters was applied to the liver tissue of mice to achieve varying degrees of ablation. Subsequently, the impedance spectra of the biological tissue were measured using an impedance analyzer at different time points before and after ablation, and the equivalent circuit method was used to quantify the results for analysis. We established a neural network model to investigate the relationship between the impedance after ablation and steady-state impedance after 72 h. Using ablation data of 55 mouse livers as training data samples and 5-fold cross-validation, the model predicted the equivalent circuit parameters after 72 h based on the equivalent circuit parameters of the tissues after 30 min of ablation. The model yielded acceptable prediction results with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.33, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 8.62%, and coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.