Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341672›Full record

ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2025

Leveraging Nanoscience and Strategic Delivery for the Expedition of Osteoporosis.

Pramoda G, Rahul K Verma, Rahul Shukla

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pramoda GDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Raebareli, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226002, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3482-6837
Rahul K VermaPharmaceutical Nanotechnology Lab, Institute of Nano Science and Technology (INST), Sector 81, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India.
Rahul ShuklaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Raebareli, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226002, India. rahulshuklapharm@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4864-0133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a globally affecting bone disease characterized by reduced bone mineral density, in which women are more insidious to the disease. It accounts for 8.9 million fractures annually, and about 50% of repeated hip fractures cause permanent disabilities. With the knowledge of determinants and pathology, various FDA-approved drugs and therapies are available for the management of the disease, but the challenges associated with those therapies lead to the adoption of nanotechnology in osteoporosis management. The nanosystems developed for the management of osteoporosis are nanogenerators, nanobubbles, microneedles, nanogels, implantable delivery systems, nanoparticles, nanofibrous scaffolds, and nanocements that probably address the current challenges related to the diagnosis and cure. In view of targeted accumulation of the cargo, various moieties assisted the nanocarrier system for selective distribution to bone, and the development of different types of nanotechnology-based delivery systems has been briefed in this review.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNanotechnologyOsteoporosisAnimalsBone DensityDrug CarriersFemaleHumansNanoparticlesDrug Carriersnanocementnanogelnanogeneratorosteoporosispeptidestargetability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.