Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40341666›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025

Recent advances in yeast and bacteria co-cultivation for bioprocess applications.

Anne Kathrine Clausen, Stefan Junne

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne Kathrine ClausenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Niels Bohrs Vej 8, Esbjerg, DK-6700, Denmark.
Stefan JunneDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Niels Bohrs Vej 8, Esbjerg, DK-6700, Denmark. sju@bio.aau.dk.

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF22OC0081345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeast and bacteria co-cultures can be found in nature and have multiple advantages that can be exploited, nowadays also in a controlled bioproduction environment. Various types of co-cultivation have been used for food applications such as production of flavor compounds in dairy products and alcoholic beverages. Co-cultures can broaden the substrate spectrum for microbial food and feed production, they can increase productivity and efficiency, and the nutritional value. Workflows have been developed from plate to bioreactor scale to increase reproducibility and optimize benefits of individual co-cultivation strategies. Nonetheless, certain limitations need to be overcome for industrial application. Many interactions of microbes, in particular in suspension cultures, are not sufficiently understood or even explored. While more possibilities arose from on-line monitoring of individual populations or even single cells, off-line measurement techniques are still typically applied in order to assess growth and product formation. Promising advances have been achieved, however, by methods for single-cell at-line and on-line analysis in co-cultures which are accounted for to emphasize the current opportunities and challenges in monitoring and controlling co-cultures. This review aims to summarize the recent advances with a particular focus on cultivation procedures and process analysis in bacteria, yeast and bacteria-yeast co-cultures. The implementation of suitable monitoring methods to enable (remote) control and contribute to quality assurance will accelerate the development and optimization of industrial co-culture bioprocesses. This will support transferability and process standardization across world regions adding to the advancement of bioproduction. The applicability of some relevant technology is, however, in its infancy.

Indexed as

BacteriaIndustrial MicrobiologyYeastsBioreactorsCoculture TechniquesFermentationCell interactionMicrobial foodPopulation analysisSingle-cell monitoringSubstrate conversion

Identifiers

PMID40341666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.